Mohammadu Buhari - News Proof

News:

Politics

Mohammadu Buhari


Showing posts with label Mohammadu Buhari. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mohammadu Buhari. Show all posts

Fallout With Tinubu, Buhari Woes Igbos Ahead 2019, Pencils Down Soludo, Nwachukwu, Nnamani, Others In Looming Cabinet Shake-Up

Fallout With Tinubu, Buhari Woes Igbos Ahead 2019, Pencils Down Soludo, Nwachukwu, Nnamani, Others In Looming Cabinet Shake-Up

Buhari
With what seems a fast developing divide within the ruling party of Nigeria, the All Progressive Congress [APC], the top players with the party find themselves re-engineering their respective positions within the party and within the general political theater in the country. Available information indicates that the fault lines appear to be developing along the binding points of the original parties that merged to form the APC – that is the Congress For Progressive Change [CPC], the Action Congress of Nigeria [ACN] and All Nigeria Peoples Party [ANPP].

In fact, it was gathered that the ongoing turmoil within the ruling party has found a strengthened resolved to continued fermenting the troubles that will inevitably see the end of the party. Particularly, the President, General Mohammadu Buhari is reported by a reliable source is no longer comfortable with the alliances built into the ruling party, particularly the south west wing of the alliance. This is believed to be coming from the recent fallout with the godfather of south west political theater, Bola Tinubu.


Bola Tinubu had been quoted of having expressed regrets over having aided in the making of General Mohammadu Buhari the President candidate of the APC – and thus the President of Nigeria. He was even quoted as promising the downfall of the APC and the Buhari administration.

In reaction, Buhari has re-opened his old channels to the south east politicians which he had collaborated with in the past political outings. Such people as, Okadigbo, Ike Nwachukwu, Ume Ezeoke and the likes are reported to have enjoyed a good relationship with Buhari. And Buhari has began holding closed door discussions with his close friends on his intended pivot to the south east. The President is quoted as having expressed concerns with collaborating with the south west… noting that he has always worked well with the south east politicians.

The President is expected to launch a cabinet reshuffle and/or purge to change the tribal balance of the cabinet and the aides to relate his new mind frame. The likes of Ken Nnamani, Ike Nwachukwu are expected to be called in to serve under the Buhari administration after the reshuffle. A reliable source mentioned the eminent professor and former Central Bank Governor, Charles Chukwuma Soludo as a possible name that the Buhari administration wants to included in the new Buhari administration.

The internal discussions which President Buhari had opened with some of his friends and northerners led to the recent admonition to be cautious of his close association with the former President, Olusegun Obasanjo. The had cautioned that Obasanjo was never a true friend of the north. They claimed Obasanjo was not good to the north during his eight as President of the federation. It is not certain how President Buhari took the advise. But what appears certain is President Buhari’s demeanor to the south west and his determination to switch alliance.

Already, reports have it that Tinubu has begun rebuilding his south west alliances in readiness to either launch a new party or  battle the President’s administration. The battle lines are drawn against the 2019. Tinubu interestingly enjoys an unlikely partnership in the person of Atiku Abubakar.


Source: 247Ureports
Buhari
With what seems a fast developing divide within the ruling party of Nigeria, the All Progressive Congress [APC], the top players with the party find themselves re-engineering their respective positions within the party and within the general political theater in the country. Available information indicates that the fault lines appear to be developing along the binding points of the original parties that merged to form the APC – that is the Congress For Progressive Change [CPC], the Action Congress of Nigeria [ACN] and All Nigeria Peoples Party [ANPP].

In fact, it was gathered that the ongoing turmoil within the ruling party has found a strengthened resolved to continued fermenting the troubles that will inevitably see the end of the party. Particularly, the President, General Mohammadu Buhari is reported by a reliable source is no longer comfortable with the alliances built into the ruling party, particularly the south west wing of the alliance. This is believed to be coming from the recent fallout with the godfather of south west political theater, Bola Tinubu.


Bola Tinubu had been quoted of having expressed regrets over having aided in the making of General Mohammadu Buhari the President candidate of the APC – and thus the President of Nigeria. He was even quoted as promising the downfall of the APC and the Buhari administration.

In reaction, Buhari has re-opened his old channels to the south east politicians which he had collaborated with in the past political outings. Such people as, Okadigbo, Ike Nwachukwu, Ume Ezeoke and the likes are reported to have enjoyed a good relationship with Buhari. And Buhari has began holding closed door discussions with his close friends on his intended pivot to the south east. The President is quoted as having expressed concerns with collaborating with the south west… noting that he has always worked well with the south east politicians.

The President is expected to launch a cabinet reshuffle and/or purge to change the tribal balance of the cabinet and the aides to relate his new mind frame. The likes of Ken Nnamani, Ike Nwachukwu are expected to be called in to serve under the Buhari administration after the reshuffle. A reliable source mentioned the eminent professor and former Central Bank Governor, Charles Chukwuma Soludo as a possible name that the Buhari administration wants to included in the new Buhari administration.

The internal discussions which President Buhari had opened with some of his friends and northerners led to the recent admonition to be cautious of his close association with the former President, Olusegun Obasanjo. The had cautioned that Obasanjo was never a true friend of the north. They claimed Obasanjo was not good to the north during his eight as President of the federation. It is not certain how President Buhari took the advise. But what appears certain is President Buhari’s demeanor to the south west and his determination to switch alliance.

Already, reports have it that Tinubu has begun rebuilding his south west alliances in readiness to either launch a new party or  battle the President’s administration. The battle lines are drawn against the 2019. Tinubu interestingly enjoys an unlikely partnership in the person of Atiku Abubakar.


Source: 247Ureports

2015 General Election: Jonathan’s Patriotic Zeal Shamed Prophets Of Doom – Buhari

2015 General Election: Jonathan’s Patriotic Zeal Shamed Prophets Of Doom – Buhari

2015 General Election: Jonathan’s Patriotic Zeal Shamed Prophets Of Doom – Buhari
President Muhammadu Buhari on Thursday commended his predecessor, Goodluck Jonathan for his role in the 2015 Presidential election.

Speaking at the Leadership award ceremony in Abuja, where he alongside Jonathan bagged the Person of the Year award, Buhari said the “patriotic zeal” of Jonathan in the past election “shamed prophets of doom” who predicted the disintegration of the country.

Buhari also applauded the Independent Electoral Commission, INEC, for its role in the last election.



According to the President,“I am most delighted to be part of this occasion organised by the Leadership Newspapers Group to honour Nigerians who have excelled in their chosen fields of endeavour.

“Let me hasten to congratulate my joint award winners, my predecessor, His Excellency, President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan, GCFR and Professor Attahiru Jega, the former Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission, as ‘Leadership Person of the Year.’

“The events of 2015 which the Leadership newspaper has chosen to bring to the fore today, marked a watershed in the political history of our country.

“Those of us who were participating actors in the elections were led by the higher ideal of the future of our great country and the well being of our people rather than the mere desire of politicians to win elections.

“It is therefore our commitment to this ideal, the patriotic zeal of President Jonathan, the impartiality of the electoral umpire, INEC and exemplary conduct of the political parties, foreign pressure and other actors that we collectively disappointed the prophets of doom who had predicted the disintegration of the country after the 2015 general election.”

Buhari, while claiming recently that he would continue to blame past administrations, maintained that the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, which ruled Nigeria for 16 years, failed in all areas.
2015 General Election: Jonathan’s Patriotic Zeal Shamed Prophets Of Doom – Buhari
President Muhammadu Buhari on Thursday commended his predecessor, Goodluck Jonathan for his role in the 2015 Presidential election.

Speaking at the Leadership award ceremony in Abuja, where he alongside Jonathan bagged the Person of the Year award, Buhari said the “patriotic zeal” of Jonathan in the past election “shamed prophets of doom” who predicted the disintegration of the country.

Buhari also applauded the Independent Electoral Commission, INEC, for its role in the last election.



According to the President,“I am most delighted to be part of this occasion organised by the Leadership Newspapers Group to honour Nigerians who have excelled in their chosen fields of endeavour.

“Let me hasten to congratulate my joint award winners, my predecessor, His Excellency, President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan, GCFR and Professor Attahiru Jega, the former Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission, as ‘Leadership Person of the Year.’

“The events of 2015 which the Leadership newspaper has chosen to bring to the fore today, marked a watershed in the political history of our country.

“Those of us who were participating actors in the elections were led by the higher ideal of the future of our great country and the well being of our people rather than the mere desire of politicians to win elections.

“It is therefore our commitment to this ideal, the patriotic zeal of President Jonathan, the impartiality of the electoral umpire, INEC and exemplary conduct of the political parties, foreign pressure and other actors that we collectively disappointed the prophets of doom who had predicted the disintegration of the country after the 2015 general election.”

Buhari, while claiming recently that he would continue to blame past administrations, maintained that the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, which ruled Nigeria for 16 years, failed in all areas.

DASUKI: Why Buhari Will Still Keep Him Despite ECOWAS Court Order

DASUKI: Why Buhari Will Still Keep Him Despite ECOWAS Court Order

dasuki
Why is former National Security Adviser (NSA) Sambo Dasuki still in detention despite court orders that he should be released?

Dasuki, NSA in the former President Goodluck Jonathan administration, is standing trial for embezzlement of over $15 billion fund meant for equipment and other logistics to fight Boko Haram, the insurgent group troubling the Northeastern part of the country.

The ECOWAS Court on Tuesday  ordered Dasuki’s release. He went to the court after a Federal High Court’s order that he should be released was ignored.


President Muhammadu Buhari’s biographer, John Paden, hinted that Dasuki’s release from detention may not happen soon.

In Chapter 15 of the book, “Muhammadu Buhari – The challenges of Leadership in Nigeria” which  focuses on ‘Military Procurement Accountability’, Paden noted that Buhari believed in confronting to the end any act of corruption that will undermine the integrity of the military.

He also disclosed that such corruption in military procurement that puts the lives of the foot soldiers at risk is capable of endangering the Nigeria Project itself.

Paden writes: “For Buhari who has said openly that he wants to be remembered for fighting corruption, it will be an unmitigated disaster for his legacy if such a gargantuan fleecing went on in his primary constituency, the military, and he failed to unearth it and punish the culprits.

“Buhari knows that Task Force and Division Commanders knew of and approved these arms purchases; Service Chiefs knew too; Ministers of Defence and Finance knew; Chief of Staff knew; civil servants in the Ministries of Defence and Finance knew, Chief of Staff to the President knew; the Vice President knew; and the President knew. It is why Buhari will keep his foot on Dasuki’s throat until he fesses up.

“Who really was Sambo Dasuki fronting for in Jonathan’s cabinet? That is the main question to which Buhari is also seeking answers.”

Paden continued: “As noted throughout this study, Buhari has a strong belief in right and wrong. He also has an abiding respect for the Nigerian military as an institution that can help hold Nigeria together.

“From Buhari’s perspective, if corruption in military procurement undermines the integrity of the military, that corruption must be confronted.

“And if such procurement allegations weaken the military response to Boko Haram and put ordinary foot soldiers at risk, that corruption poses a double threat, endangering even the Nigeria Project itself.”

Paden however ruled out personal or political affiliation as a reason for Dasuki’s continuous incarceration.

He said: “It is beyond the scope of this study to assess all the back stories of the relationship between Buhari and Dasuki. Suffice it to say that the so-called grudge between the two has never really existed.

“Dasuki is twelve years younger than Buhari, even though Dasuki did participate in the 1985 countercoup. The family of Ibrahim Dasuki and the Buhari extended family have been linked by marriage for more than four decades.

“In addition, in his inaugural address, Buhari had professed that although ‘the past is prologue’, he had no time to pursue alleged ‘enemies.”

“Other personal relationships in play included Buhari’s relationship with Jonathan’s Minister of Defence, General Aliyu Gusau and Buhari’s relationship with General Babangida, who has played such a ubiquitous role in Fourth Republic politics.

“Yet the real story probably has little to do with personal or political relationships.”

dasuki
Why is former National Security Adviser (NSA) Sambo Dasuki still in detention despite court orders that he should be released?

Dasuki, NSA in the former President Goodluck Jonathan administration, is standing trial for embezzlement of over $15 billion fund meant for equipment and other logistics to fight Boko Haram, the insurgent group troubling the Northeastern part of the country.

The ECOWAS Court on Tuesday  ordered Dasuki’s release. He went to the court after a Federal High Court’s order that he should be released was ignored.


President Muhammadu Buhari’s biographer, John Paden, hinted that Dasuki’s release from detention may not happen soon.

In Chapter 15 of the book, “Muhammadu Buhari – The challenges of Leadership in Nigeria” which  focuses on ‘Military Procurement Accountability’, Paden noted that Buhari believed in confronting to the end any act of corruption that will undermine the integrity of the military.

He also disclosed that such corruption in military procurement that puts the lives of the foot soldiers at risk is capable of endangering the Nigeria Project itself.

Paden writes: “For Buhari who has said openly that he wants to be remembered for fighting corruption, it will be an unmitigated disaster for his legacy if such a gargantuan fleecing went on in his primary constituency, the military, and he failed to unearth it and punish the culprits.

“Buhari knows that Task Force and Division Commanders knew of and approved these arms purchases; Service Chiefs knew too; Ministers of Defence and Finance knew; Chief of Staff knew; civil servants in the Ministries of Defence and Finance knew, Chief of Staff to the President knew; the Vice President knew; and the President knew. It is why Buhari will keep his foot on Dasuki’s throat until he fesses up.

“Who really was Sambo Dasuki fronting for in Jonathan’s cabinet? That is the main question to which Buhari is also seeking answers.”

Paden continued: “As noted throughout this study, Buhari has a strong belief in right and wrong. He also has an abiding respect for the Nigerian military as an institution that can help hold Nigeria together.

“From Buhari’s perspective, if corruption in military procurement undermines the integrity of the military, that corruption must be confronted.

“And if such procurement allegations weaken the military response to Boko Haram and put ordinary foot soldiers at risk, that corruption poses a double threat, endangering even the Nigeria Project itself.”

Paden however ruled out personal or political affiliation as a reason for Dasuki’s continuous incarceration.

He said: “It is beyond the scope of this study to assess all the back stories of the relationship between Buhari and Dasuki. Suffice it to say that the so-called grudge between the two has never really existed.

“Dasuki is twelve years younger than Buhari, even though Dasuki did participate in the 1985 countercoup. The family of Ibrahim Dasuki and the Buhari extended family have been linked by marriage for more than four decades.

“In addition, in his inaugural address, Buhari had professed that although ‘the past is prologue’, he had no time to pursue alleged ‘enemies.”

“Other personal relationships in play included Buhari’s relationship with Jonathan’s Minister of Defence, General Aliyu Gusau and Buhari’s relationship with General Babangida, who has played such a ubiquitous role in Fourth Republic politics.

“Yet the real story probably has little to do with personal or political relationships.”

Osinbajo: Buhari, Biographer LIED In New Book - Tinubu's Men Say

Osinbajo: Buhari, Biographer LIED In New Book - Tinubu's Men Say

Osinbajo: Buhari, Biographer LIED In New Book - Tinubu's Men Say
APC chieftains and former aides of the National leader the APC Bola Tinubu, have accused John Paden, the publisher of a new book on President Buhari of telling lies in the book titled: "Muhammadu Buhari: The Challenges of Leadership in Nigeria".

“Buhari and his biographer, Paden lied, according to Lateef Raji a former commissioner under Tinubu.

Prof Paden had claimed that Tinubu, had put pressure Buhari to be made the vice presidential candidate but was turned down.


Another close associate Tunji Bello in an elaborate account below expressed anguish at President Buhari and his biographer's lie in the new book.

Tunji Bello's Account:
Nothing strengthens deceit more than silence. And on an occasion like this, one often wonders why some people twist events and history in order to legitimize a mission. While ruminating over why this should be, it is not impossible to embark on introspection by thinking out so many possibilities that politics is replete with. This line of thought is informed by laughable events of the last few days.The news media have become agog with false story as to how Vice President Yemi Osibajo came to be. During the launch of a book: ‘Muhammadu Buhari: The Challenges of leadership in Nigeria,’ a biography on President Mohammadu Buhari in Abuja on Monday, 3rd October 2016, Nigerians were fed with half truths by the author, Professor John Paden, on how Osibajo became the Vice President of the country. I don’t know how the author came about his story, but he totally got it wrong because what he wrote basically is based on falsehood that reeks of deliberate misinformation and mischief.I know how Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu picked Vice President Yemi Osibajo because I was part of the process that midwifed his nomination. In mid-December 2014, it was a Saturday morning after President Muhammadu Buhari had been picked by All Progressives Congress (APC), at the party’s presidential primary at Teslim Balogun Stadium in Surulere, Lagos. I received a phone call from Asiwaju to see him that morning. On my way to his house, I discovered that a car at a reasonable distance was that of former Lagos State Commissioner for Information and Strategy, Dele Alake, who was, ostensibly, heading towards Asiwaju’s house in Ikoyi. Asiwaju must have called him too for that task that could be explained underneath.
As soon as we arrived, Asiwaju quickly asked us to join him in his car as we headed to a guest house. At the guest house, the former APC Chairman, Chief Bisi Akande, Professor Yemi Osibajo and one renowned Pastor joined us.
At the meeting, Asiwaju related to us the urgent need to pick a vice-presidential candidate for the APC. He advised that we immediately discard the idea of his being nominated for the vice-presidential slot as it was no longer possible to pick a Muslim-Muslim ticket. This he reasoned made sense if indeed we were to be realistic in our bid to defeat President Goodluck Jonathan in the 2015 election. He reasoned that what was important and imperative at that time was to look for a good Christian nominee to complement President Muhammadu Buhari.
I remember Baba Akande responded to his aversions that he would still have preferred that Asiwaju should be the running mate since it had been done before. Baba Akande was obviously referring to the MKO Abiola/ Babagana Kingibe nomination. Asiwaju responded by distinguishing the political equation then from what was before us at that point in time. He foreclosed that scenario as no longer possible. We all voiced our opinions, and at the end of the day, it was resolved that we had to get a Christian candidate.
It was at this point that Asiwaju reminded us to be fast in coming up with an option because he felt other geographical zones are also jostling for same position reiterating the need for the south-west to get it as a must. Asiwaju audaciously told us for that left for him, and if he were to pick anyone, he would suggest Professor Yemi Osibajo. That Osibajo, apart from being a brilliant legal luminary is also a committed progressive, and democrat. And having been married to late Obafemi Awolowo’s grand-daughter, it would not be a problem selling him to the old political establishment of south-west for acceptance. He asserted that Alake and myself having served in his cabinet could attest to the great works he did as Attorney General during his, Asiwaju’s administration as Governor of Lagos State. He also reasoned that the second major factor in favour of Osibajo was the fact that he is a strong Christian and one that he is already a Pastor at the Redeemed Christian Church of God (RCCG).
In the long run, Osibajo’s nomination was well received by all of us at that meeting and Professor Osibajo was asked to start detailing with us, further strategy sessions to which he brought out his laptop and we all commenced a brainstorming session.
The rest of the discussion was to strategise on how to contain other likely opponents from the southwest zone before proceeding to Abuja to battle other regional zones in the coming nomination.The meeting did not finish until about 9.00pm when we returned to Asiwaju’s residence in Bourdillon. By the time we returned to his house, there were about six serving governors already waiting to see him from different parts of Nigeria.
What is particularly sad now is that the book launch of the president was deployed to create a make-believe story that puts the society at a disadvantage of history. One would have thought that now that the progressives, through an uncommon alliance in 2015, created an upset by defeating, for the first time in the country’s history, the then ruling People’s Democratic Party, it might be taken as given that the role of all active participants in the exercise would be correctly recorded. But surprisingly and painfully too, such an avenue was used to create an historical distortion of facts.
If a political adversary had done that, one would not have been disturbed. This is because at the end of the day under such circumstance, the goal is usually to create a make-believe story that puts the society on a wrong side of history. But now that the progressives, through an uncommon alliance in 2015, created an upset by defeating, for the first time in the country’s history, the then ruling People’s Democratic Party, it might be taken as given that the role of all active participants in the exercise would be correctly recorded. But surprisingly painful is the fact that an historical distortion of facts is coming from an unexpected quarters at this early stage of progressive politics.
It becomes more of a matter of concern when a renowned intellectual writes a book and begins to redefine events in his own way by abashedly evading facts that are bellowing in the public space in order to re-create a world of make-believe for his audience. Sincerely, such an act understandably becomes a matter to ponder seriously.
Let us stop here. It is not all clothes that can be dried in the sun.
Osinbajo: Buhari, Biographer LIED In New Book - Tinubu's Men Say
APC chieftains and former aides of the National leader the APC Bola Tinubu, have accused John Paden, the publisher of a new book on President Buhari of telling lies in the book titled: "Muhammadu Buhari: The Challenges of Leadership in Nigeria".

“Buhari and his biographer, Paden lied, according to Lateef Raji a former commissioner under Tinubu.

Prof Paden had claimed that Tinubu, had put pressure Buhari to be made the vice presidential candidate but was turned down.


Another close associate Tunji Bello in an elaborate account below expressed anguish at President Buhari and his biographer's lie in the new book.

Tunji Bello's Account:
Nothing strengthens deceit more than silence. And on an occasion like this, one often wonders why some people twist events and history in order to legitimize a mission. While ruminating over why this should be, it is not impossible to embark on introspection by thinking out so many possibilities that politics is replete with. This line of thought is informed by laughable events of the last few days.The news media have become agog with false story as to how Vice President Yemi Osibajo came to be. During the launch of a book: ‘Muhammadu Buhari: The Challenges of leadership in Nigeria,’ a biography on President Mohammadu Buhari in Abuja on Monday, 3rd October 2016, Nigerians were fed with half truths by the author, Professor John Paden, on how Osibajo became the Vice President of the country. I don’t know how the author came about his story, but he totally got it wrong because what he wrote basically is based on falsehood that reeks of deliberate misinformation and mischief.I know how Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu picked Vice President Yemi Osibajo because I was part of the process that midwifed his nomination. In mid-December 2014, it was a Saturday morning after President Muhammadu Buhari had been picked by All Progressives Congress (APC), at the party’s presidential primary at Teslim Balogun Stadium in Surulere, Lagos. I received a phone call from Asiwaju to see him that morning. On my way to his house, I discovered that a car at a reasonable distance was that of former Lagos State Commissioner for Information and Strategy, Dele Alake, who was, ostensibly, heading towards Asiwaju’s house in Ikoyi. Asiwaju must have called him too for that task that could be explained underneath.
As soon as we arrived, Asiwaju quickly asked us to join him in his car as we headed to a guest house. At the guest house, the former APC Chairman, Chief Bisi Akande, Professor Yemi Osibajo and one renowned Pastor joined us.
At the meeting, Asiwaju related to us the urgent need to pick a vice-presidential candidate for the APC. He advised that we immediately discard the idea of his being nominated for the vice-presidential slot as it was no longer possible to pick a Muslim-Muslim ticket. This he reasoned made sense if indeed we were to be realistic in our bid to defeat President Goodluck Jonathan in the 2015 election. He reasoned that what was important and imperative at that time was to look for a good Christian nominee to complement President Muhammadu Buhari.
I remember Baba Akande responded to his aversions that he would still have preferred that Asiwaju should be the running mate since it had been done before. Baba Akande was obviously referring to the MKO Abiola/ Babagana Kingibe nomination. Asiwaju responded by distinguishing the political equation then from what was before us at that point in time. He foreclosed that scenario as no longer possible. We all voiced our opinions, and at the end of the day, it was resolved that we had to get a Christian candidate.
It was at this point that Asiwaju reminded us to be fast in coming up with an option because he felt other geographical zones are also jostling for same position reiterating the need for the south-west to get it as a must. Asiwaju audaciously told us for that left for him, and if he were to pick anyone, he would suggest Professor Yemi Osibajo. That Osibajo, apart from being a brilliant legal luminary is also a committed progressive, and democrat. And having been married to late Obafemi Awolowo’s grand-daughter, it would not be a problem selling him to the old political establishment of south-west for acceptance. He asserted that Alake and myself having served in his cabinet could attest to the great works he did as Attorney General during his, Asiwaju’s administration as Governor of Lagos State. He also reasoned that the second major factor in favour of Osibajo was the fact that he is a strong Christian and one that he is already a Pastor at the Redeemed Christian Church of God (RCCG).
In the long run, Osibajo’s nomination was well received by all of us at that meeting and Professor Osibajo was asked to start detailing with us, further strategy sessions to which he brought out his laptop and we all commenced a brainstorming session.
The rest of the discussion was to strategise on how to contain other likely opponents from the southwest zone before proceeding to Abuja to battle other regional zones in the coming nomination.The meeting did not finish until about 9.00pm when we returned to Asiwaju’s residence in Bourdillon. By the time we returned to his house, there were about six serving governors already waiting to see him from different parts of Nigeria.
What is particularly sad now is that the book launch of the president was deployed to create a make-believe story that puts the society at a disadvantage of history. One would have thought that now that the progressives, through an uncommon alliance in 2015, created an upset by defeating, for the first time in the country’s history, the then ruling People’s Democratic Party, it might be taken as given that the role of all active participants in the exercise would be correctly recorded. But surprisingly and painfully too, such an avenue was used to create an historical distortion of facts.
If a political adversary had done that, one would not have been disturbed. This is because at the end of the day under such circumstance, the goal is usually to create a make-believe story that puts the society on a wrong side of history. But now that the progressives, through an uncommon alliance in 2015, created an upset by defeating, for the first time in the country’s history, the then ruling People’s Democratic Party, it might be taken as given that the role of all active participants in the exercise would be correctly recorded. But surprisingly painful is the fact that an historical distortion of facts is coming from an unexpected quarters at this early stage of progressive politics.
It becomes more of a matter of concern when a renowned intellectual writes a book and begins to redefine events in his own way by abashedly evading facts that are bellowing in the public space in order to re-create a world of make-believe for his audience. Sincerely, such an act understandably becomes a matter to ponder seriously.
Let us stop here. It is not all clothes that can be dried in the sun.

APC Crisis: Tinubu In Secret Talks With Yoruba Leaders To Rejig AD As Buhari 'Queues Behind Oyegun

APC Crisis: Tinubu In Secret Talks With Yoruba Leaders To Rejig AD As Buhari 'Queues Behind Oyegun

Tinubu returns to alliance for democracy ad
The embattled national leaders of the ruling All Progressives Congress, APC, Asiwaju Bola Armed Tinubu may have retraced his step and return to the Alliance for Democracy, AD, a former party that he was made the governor of Lagos State 18 years ago

Report monitored via Daily Sun Newspaper suggests that, the moribund Alliance for Democracy (AD) may be the political haven for associates of embattled National Leader of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu ahead of the 2019 general elections


It was gathered that that except President Muhammadu Buhari and well-meaning stakeholders in the ruling party take concrete and genuine steps to placate the former Lagos State governor, his allies may ditch the party for the AD.

A party source revealed that Tinubu’s camp may have opened discussions with stakeholders of the platform that brought him to power in 1999.

The party source noted that the forthcoming Ondo State governorship election would be used to test the waters.

The rejection of the  recommendations of the three-member Election Appeal Committee chaired by Mrs. Helen Bendega, which called for cancellation of the poll that produced Chief Rotimi Akeredolu (SAN), and the submission of his name to INEC by the National Chairman, Chief John Odigie-Oyegun was the cause of the cold war betweenTinubu and the latter.

Tinubu, while demanding for the resignation of Odigie-Oyegun, accused the former Edo State governor of treating with disdain the joint petition written by Chiefs Oke, Olusegun Abraham and Senator Ajayi Borrofice rejecting the outcome of the primary that produced Akeredolu.

While the national leader backed Abraham for the ticket, forces in the Presidency supported Akeredolu, who was president of the Nigeria Bar Association (NBA).

Daily Sun gathered that Tinubu’s associates were taken aback that while President Buhari invited the National Chairman of the party to the Presidential Villa on Tuesday, he has not made any move to open discussion with Tinubu.

It also learnt that the APC leader’s allies may have initiated a deal aimed at reconciling with certain aggrieved leaders of the Yoruba socio-cultural group,  Afenifere, who were ditched during the power game to insulate the AD from  the  Afenifere.

In the vanguard of those who insisted that  Afenifere and AD should not be mutually inclusive were Tinubu, Chief Olusegun Osoba, the late Lam Adesina, Chief Bisi Akande, former governors of Lagos, Ogun, Oyo and Osun states respectively. While the late Ondo State governor, Adebayo Adefarati backed the leadership of  Afenifere, the former Ekiti State governor, Niyi Adebayo sat on the fence.

Among those who fell out with Tinubu and other AD governors  in league with him, were the Afenifere leader, Chief Abraham Adesanya (now late), Chief Ayo Adebanjo, Olaniwun Ajayi and Reuben Fasoranti. The struggle to separate  Afenifere from the control of the political party also culminated in the polarisation of the Yoruba group into two factions with Chief Fasanmi and Fasoranti as factional chairmen.

Speaking with Daily Sun on phone, Tinubu’s media aide, Tunde Rahman, however, refused to comment. He said: “Who are those making the insinuations? Let them justify what they are saying. I don’t want to react to that!”

But in his reaction, a member of the  Afenifere, Yinka Odumakin, neither denied nor confirmed the reconciliation moves. He told Daily Sun that there was urgent need for the Yoruba to speak with one voice, noting noted that it was the desire of Afenifere as a group.

“I am not yet in the picture; what we know is that we are for peace and unity in Yorubalnd. The details of such talks,  I can’t tell you, but Afenifere’s desire is for strong realignment in Yorubaland”.
Tinubu returns to alliance for democracy ad
The embattled national leaders of the ruling All Progressives Congress, APC, Asiwaju Bola Armed Tinubu may have retraced his step and return to the Alliance for Democracy, AD, a former party that he was made the governor of Lagos State 18 years ago

Report monitored via Daily Sun Newspaper suggests that, the moribund Alliance for Democracy (AD) may be the political haven for associates of embattled National Leader of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu ahead of the 2019 general elections


It was gathered that that except President Muhammadu Buhari and well-meaning stakeholders in the ruling party take concrete and genuine steps to placate the former Lagos State governor, his allies may ditch the party for the AD.

A party source revealed that Tinubu’s camp may have opened discussions with stakeholders of the platform that brought him to power in 1999.

The party source noted that the forthcoming Ondo State governorship election would be used to test the waters.

The rejection of the  recommendations of the three-member Election Appeal Committee chaired by Mrs. Helen Bendega, which called for cancellation of the poll that produced Chief Rotimi Akeredolu (SAN), and the submission of his name to INEC by the National Chairman, Chief John Odigie-Oyegun was the cause of the cold war betweenTinubu and the latter.

Tinubu, while demanding for the resignation of Odigie-Oyegun, accused the former Edo State governor of treating with disdain the joint petition written by Chiefs Oke, Olusegun Abraham and Senator Ajayi Borrofice rejecting the outcome of the primary that produced Akeredolu.

While the national leader backed Abraham for the ticket, forces in the Presidency supported Akeredolu, who was president of the Nigeria Bar Association (NBA).

Daily Sun gathered that Tinubu’s associates were taken aback that while President Buhari invited the National Chairman of the party to the Presidential Villa on Tuesday, he has not made any move to open discussion with Tinubu.

It also learnt that the APC leader’s allies may have initiated a deal aimed at reconciling with certain aggrieved leaders of the Yoruba socio-cultural group,  Afenifere, who were ditched during the power game to insulate the AD from  the  Afenifere.

In the vanguard of those who insisted that  Afenifere and AD should not be mutually inclusive were Tinubu, Chief Olusegun Osoba, the late Lam Adesina, Chief Bisi Akande, former governors of Lagos, Ogun, Oyo and Osun states respectively. While the late Ondo State governor, Adebayo Adefarati backed the leadership of  Afenifere, the former Ekiti State governor, Niyi Adebayo sat on the fence.

Among those who fell out with Tinubu and other AD governors  in league with him, were the Afenifere leader, Chief Abraham Adesanya (now late), Chief Ayo Adebanjo, Olaniwun Ajayi and Reuben Fasoranti. The struggle to separate  Afenifere from the control of the political party also culminated in the polarisation of the Yoruba group into two factions with Chief Fasanmi and Fasoranti as factional chairmen.

Speaking with Daily Sun on phone, Tinubu’s media aide, Tunde Rahman, however, refused to comment. He said: “Who are those making the insinuations? Let them justify what they are saying. I don’t want to react to that!”

But in his reaction, a member of the  Afenifere, Yinka Odumakin, neither denied nor confirmed the reconciliation moves. He told Daily Sun that there was urgent need for the Yoruba to speak with one voice, noting noted that it was the desire of Afenifere as a group.

“I am not yet in the picture; what we know is that we are for peace and unity in Yorubalnd. The details of such talks,  I can’t tell you, but Afenifere’s desire is for strong realignment in Yorubaland”.

APC Feud: Tinubu, Yoruba and the Fulani North, By Irohin Oodua

APC Feud: Tinubu, Yoruba and the Fulani North, By Irohin Oodua

APC Feud: Tinubu, Yoruba and the Fulani North, By Irohin Oodua
We have seen many lines put across on the simmering dispute in the All Progressives Congress, (APC). Very few of the analysis have been put in true historic context, thereby rubbing many observers the substance. We must understand why the current crisis in APC is inevitable and why the heat will not fizzle out. 

Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu was responsible, in part, for the victory of President Mohammadu Buhari, at the 2015 poll. Today, there is deepening political recession in the APC, compared to the economic meltdown that jolts the country. The APC is now factionalised along vicious power blocs, the El Rufai group; the Atiku Abubakar group and the Tinubu faction, both in perpetual conflict with one another. 

Behind each faction are puns and robots, sometimes blind, sometimes conscious, often oblivious of the core issues, or at times egoistic, anxious to settle personal political grudges with perceived rivals. Why? This should be expected for anyone with a deep sense of history. 


During the 2015 Presidential election, the APC became a rainbow of conflicting groups with different motivating factors but united on the minimum programme of kicking out the Goodluck Jonathan regime which had dragged the country down a dark, chilling tunnel. 

The APC uprising against Jonathan was not driven by any ideological movement, but by the same vested interests whose disagreement is based on what methods should be used to keep the masses under their stranglehold. In form, they were different, in content they were the same.

For one thing, Jonathan was a product of the same historic game of intrigues that has continued to undermine the interest of the people. He became the “candidate of the South” and “Ijaw leader”, the accolades he fueled as a strategy for survival. But in reality, he was not put forward by the Ijaw or the South, based on conviction, as their beloved, trusted son but rather imposed by the same Northern caliphate through their crony, former President Olusegun Obasanjo. It was the same enemy of the people that brought him, to delude the people and attempt to stabilize the system, in the wake of the Niger-Delta uprising led by the Ijaw people. 

Jonathan promised to restructure the country, the most profound intellectual meal ticket any Nigerian leader ever offered Nigeria, but there were proven doubts about his will and capacity to pull through this promise. He was held captive by many factors, the chief being the control of the National Assembly by the same primordial forces the idea the National Conference was to challenge. 

In the first place, the National Assembly in terms of numerical strength was orchestrated by past military regimes to ensure the victory of the Fulani hegemony at all times. All the states and Local Governments in Nigeria were created by the military, usually the Fulani agents. The delineation of wards and constituencies were created by the same group to give the North an eternal advantage. The population figures, the voters registration all have been maneuvered to give the impression that the North only needs one section from the South to win the Presidential election. This is fueled by the illusion that the Yoruba and the Igbo or South-South can never work together. 

So, ab initio, it was trite and lacking in critical thinking to have assumed that the reports of the National Conference would be approved by the undemocratic National Assembly. The only thing that can bring the National Conference is mass action and defiance by the aggrieved.

Unfortunately, the APC that produced Buhari did not go to the election with any promise to restructure Nigeria. It was basically an alliance between the Yoruba and the Hausa Fulani to capture political power. 

Either we like it or not, the Tinubu group represents a trend in the APC, but the most profound of that strength is the fact that it was seen as the most potent political group representing the Yoruba, being one of the biggest ethnic nationalities in Nigeria. It was the first time the Yoruba would forge any alliance with the Fulani North. Unfortunately, the Tinubu group went into the alliance without any Memorandum of Understanding, MOU. It was propelled by the euphoria to oust Jonathan without any concrete projection about the contradictions that would follow. 

The major source of the perpetual conflict in Nigeria, which is the National Question was not put on the table, not negotiations with the Fulani North on the positions that should be reserved for the Yoruba. The Tinubu group obviously was not painstaking enough. 

There were elements of crass naiveté. One of Tinubu’s greatest errors is not to cultivate a support base driven by ideology and political education. His political powers are often derived from cash, and unlike Awolowo, not nurtured by ideas and mind-conscientisation through knowledge. His group runs no political education classes and yet hopes to sustain a great tradition among his people. This is an illusion. 

What has kept the Tinubu group strong is nothing but the absence of an ideologically driven movement in Yorubaland. The Tinubu group also lacks a conscious Think Thank but rather relies on mercenaries who often are not loyal and usually untrustworthy which is responsible for the high rate of defection in his camp. However, as it is, his group will definitely not last long, if it does not change its tactics, but nevertheless, it remains the most formidable among the power-seeking political groupings in Yoruba of today.

We must admit that why the Tinubu group had some iota of determination to uplift the country from stupor and usher in some elements of rebirth, this philosophy of rebirth is secondary to the Fulani oligarchy. What the group wanted was not just the return of power not to the North, but to the hands of the Fulani supremacist. 

It must be noted that the choice of Buhari by the Fulani North was deliberate. He was seen as the best candidate that could muster the needed paradigm shift of power from the South to the North. Though initially the Northern oligarchy did not want him, but soon after the primary, he was adopted as the strategic peg needed. He met the figure that could arouse public support in the entire North. Why the Tinubu group in APC were hungry for the exit of the Peoples Democratic Party, (PDP), the Fulani North was desperate for political power, through any of the existing political parties, realizing that whoever got the political power would get every other thing. 

The Tinubu group also relied on the so called ‘honest intention’ of Buhari, without realizing that being honest does not remove the fact that a honest leader can at the same time be brutal, egocentric, paranoid and inherently tribalistic. 

Buhari is all of the above.It is self defeatist to imagine that Buhari would transform the economy. He had not written any major intellectual book in his 40 year public life career. He had not written any essay, not even half a newspaper page on any topic of interest for the past 40 years. His only asset is Pula, the Fulani philosophy for self-discipline and endurance. There is no great nation that can emerge without ideas. 

No great leader has ever emerged without personal intellectual power engineered by knowledge and prowess in the art of written words and demonstrated political skills. The performance of Buhari in the past one year is an indication that his 18 month glory as former Head of State could be attributed to the skill of his late lieutenant, Tunde Idiagbon. Buhari's appointment of Ministers without consultation with the leaders of geo-political zones, except with his own Fulani cronies was deliberate. He wanted the Ministers to be loyal to him and his Fulani leaders. He wanted the largely naive Ministers not to be at liberty to build fresh political alliances that could neutralise his interests.

As it, Buhari is about to fulfill the mission with which he has been designed. He is going to spend only one term. The plan is to replace him with another Fulani oligarch. By spending only one term, the North will have one advantage: it will be able to rule Nigeria for the next 12 years, instead of 8 years if Buhari re-contests in 2019. It is in this line that Atiku Abubakar spoke in favourof restructuring. But that remains a personal statement and not the collective will of the Fulani North.

The Fulani sees Nigeria as her inheritance. When people talk about Fulani supporting development and growth, they are mistaking. Development and growth means education and a deeper sense of the past. But to the average Fulani, that remain an outstanding threat to survival and the Fulani ability to manipulate Nigeria and shape the country in her own image. 

The Fulani came to Nigeria less than 250 years ago. The population is just 7million. The tribe imposed her will on most part of the North through the 1804 Jihad. Since then, it has survived through the mastery of intrigues and subterfuge. 

Fulani is ruled by fear of its extinction, having been famished in most African countries where the nationality once held sway, leaving Nigeria as the only country where the Fulani maintains her brutal stronghold on power. Her most potent weapon is “divide and rule.” It is in the interest of the Fulani to keep on postponing the doomsday in Nigeria. This is because the disintegration of Nigeria will expose the emptiness of the Fulani and possibly fuel Hausa uprising. The Hausa are perhaps the most traumatised ethnic group in the world. 

The Hausa land having been seized and taken over in an irreversible Fulani revolution, the Fulani Emirs today control the entire Hausa indigenous land and territories. It is to her convenience to be referred to as Hausa Fulani, but deep down, the Fulani is supremacist in nature, distrusts and hates the average Hausa person.

As the battle rages, between Tinubu and the Fulani North, there will be deceit and deception. Tinubu will be deceived into thinking the problem is Buhari. He will forge a new alliance with another Fulani group only for him to be disappointed again and again. The only alliance the Fulani understands is the one that sees the partner as a slave and the Fulani as the master. 

At the centre of all is the nationality question, the battle by ethnic lords to control Nigerian resources with Tinubu and Buhari being mere figures in the contest that did not start today. As 2019 draws nearer, the Fulani North is likely to realign with only one Fulani political figure, while the heat will be focused on Tinubu and his group. In this battle, every Yoruba person, unless those ready to play the second fiddle, will be seen as the enemy. 

The Fulani, with the state structure now firmly in her hands, will be more brutal and vicious in the campaign to decimate the South West, seek deceptive alliances with other regions, in other to isolate and humble her traditional foe, the Yoruba South West. 

It is in this context that agents of the Fulani are being recruited, across the South West to prosecute this primordial and well know war. 

Interestingly, if history serves as reference, this well known persecution and treachery of the Fulani, will only make Tinubu more popular among the Yoruba people. In the years, ahead, even Tinubu’s traditional enemies in Yorubaland will rally around him and rise up in his vigorous defence. 

Awo did not become a god until he was jailed by the Fulani oligarchy. 

MKO Abiola did not become a Yoruba icon until he was humiliated by the same Fulani North. 

The Yoruba people have a deep sense of history. Eliminating Tinubu will only make matter worse for a country that has not known peace since her forceful 1914 amalgamation. 

What will further save Tinubu is for him to go back to his people, the Yoruba, seek alliance with genuine forces working for the restructuring of Nigeria, and stop relying on building castles in the air, with the hope that a section of the Hausa-Fulani will one day align and work with him to rebuild Nigeria based on utilitarian values. 

At the end, the Fulani is not calculating enough and now at wits end. It would have been to the eternal glory of this race If the Fulani allow the culture of debate and democracy to nurture instead of being paranoid and ready to destroy everything in order to remain as the most precious political group.

THE IROHINOODUA EDITORIAL
APC Feud: Tinubu, Yoruba and the Fulani North, By Irohin Oodua
We have seen many lines put across on the simmering dispute in the All Progressives Congress, (APC). Very few of the analysis have been put in true historic context, thereby rubbing many observers the substance. We must understand why the current crisis in APC is inevitable and why the heat will not fizzle out. 

Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu was responsible, in part, for the victory of President Mohammadu Buhari, at the 2015 poll. Today, there is deepening political recession in the APC, compared to the economic meltdown that jolts the country. The APC is now factionalised along vicious power blocs, the El Rufai group; the Atiku Abubakar group and the Tinubu faction, both in perpetual conflict with one another. 

Behind each faction are puns and robots, sometimes blind, sometimes conscious, often oblivious of the core issues, or at times egoistic, anxious to settle personal political grudges with perceived rivals. Why? This should be expected for anyone with a deep sense of history. 


During the 2015 Presidential election, the APC became a rainbow of conflicting groups with different motivating factors but united on the minimum programme of kicking out the Goodluck Jonathan regime which had dragged the country down a dark, chilling tunnel. 

The APC uprising against Jonathan was not driven by any ideological movement, but by the same vested interests whose disagreement is based on what methods should be used to keep the masses under their stranglehold. In form, they were different, in content they were the same.

For one thing, Jonathan was a product of the same historic game of intrigues that has continued to undermine the interest of the people. He became the “candidate of the South” and “Ijaw leader”, the accolades he fueled as a strategy for survival. But in reality, he was not put forward by the Ijaw or the South, based on conviction, as their beloved, trusted son but rather imposed by the same Northern caliphate through their crony, former President Olusegun Obasanjo. It was the same enemy of the people that brought him, to delude the people and attempt to stabilize the system, in the wake of the Niger-Delta uprising led by the Ijaw people. 

Jonathan promised to restructure the country, the most profound intellectual meal ticket any Nigerian leader ever offered Nigeria, but there were proven doubts about his will and capacity to pull through this promise. He was held captive by many factors, the chief being the control of the National Assembly by the same primordial forces the idea the National Conference was to challenge. 

In the first place, the National Assembly in terms of numerical strength was orchestrated by past military regimes to ensure the victory of the Fulani hegemony at all times. All the states and Local Governments in Nigeria were created by the military, usually the Fulani agents. The delineation of wards and constituencies were created by the same group to give the North an eternal advantage. The population figures, the voters registration all have been maneuvered to give the impression that the North only needs one section from the South to win the Presidential election. This is fueled by the illusion that the Yoruba and the Igbo or South-South can never work together. 

So, ab initio, it was trite and lacking in critical thinking to have assumed that the reports of the National Conference would be approved by the undemocratic National Assembly. The only thing that can bring the National Conference is mass action and defiance by the aggrieved.

Unfortunately, the APC that produced Buhari did not go to the election with any promise to restructure Nigeria. It was basically an alliance between the Yoruba and the Hausa Fulani to capture political power. 

Either we like it or not, the Tinubu group represents a trend in the APC, but the most profound of that strength is the fact that it was seen as the most potent political group representing the Yoruba, being one of the biggest ethnic nationalities in Nigeria. It was the first time the Yoruba would forge any alliance with the Fulani North. Unfortunately, the Tinubu group went into the alliance without any Memorandum of Understanding, MOU. It was propelled by the euphoria to oust Jonathan without any concrete projection about the contradictions that would follow. 

The major source of the perpetual conflict in Nigeria, which is the National Question was not put on the table, not negotiations with the Fulani North on the positions that should be reserved for the Yoruba. The Tinubu group obviously was not painstaking enough. 

There were elements of crass naiveté. One of Tinubu’s greatest errors is not to cultivate a support base driven by ideology and political education. His political powers are often derived from cash, and unlike Awolowo, not nurtured by ideas and mind-conscientisation through knowledge. His group runs no political education classes and yet hopes to sustain a great tradition among his people. This is an illusion. 

What has kept the Tinubu group strong is nothing but the absence of an ideologically driven movement in Yorubaland. The Tinubu group also lacks a conscious Think Thank but rather relies on mercenaries who often are not loyal and usually untrustworthy which is responsible for the high rate of defection in his camp. However, as it is, his group will definitely not last long, if it does not change its tactics, but nevertheless, it remains the most formidable among the power-seeking political groupings in Yoruba of today.

We must admit that why the Tinubu group had some iota of determination to uplift the country from stupor and usher in some elements of rebirth, this philosophy of rebirth is secondary to the Fulani oligarchy. What the group wanted was not just the return of power not to the North, but to the hands of the Fulani supremacist. 

It must be noted that the choice of Buhari by the Fulani North was deliberate. He was seen as the best candidate that could muster the needed paradigm shift of power from the South to the North. Though initially the Northern oligarchy did not want him, but soon after the primary, he was adopted as the strategic peg needed. He met the figure that could arouse public support in the entire North. Why the Tinubu group in APC were hungry for the exit of the Peoples Democratic Party, (PDP), the Fulani North was desperate for political power, through any of the existing political parties, realizing that whoever got the political power would get every other thing. 

The Tinubu group also relied on the so called ‘honest intention’ of Buhari, without realizing that being honest does not remove the fact that a honest leader can at the same time be brutal, egocentric, paranoid and inherently tribalistic. 

Buhari is all of the above.It is self defeatist to imagine that Buhari would transform the economy. He had not written any major intellectual book in his 40 year public life career. He had not written any essay, not even half a newspaper page on any topic of interest for the past 40 years. His only asset is Pula, the Fulani philosophy for self-discipline and endurance. There is no great nation that can emerge without ideas. 

No great leader has ever emerged without personal intellectual power engineered by knowledge and prowess in the art of written words and demonstrated political skills. The performance of Buhari in the past one year is an indication that his 18 month glory as former Head of State could be attributed to the skill of his late lieutenant, Tunde Idiagbon. Buhari's appointment of Ministers without consultation with the leaders of geo-political zones, except with his own Fulani cronies was deliberate. He wanted the Ministers to be loyal to him and his Fulani leaders. He wanted the largely naive Ministers not to be at liberty to build fresh political alliances that could neutralise his interests.

As it, Buhari is about to fulfill the mission with which he has been designed. He is going to spend only one term. The plan is to replace him with another Fulani oligarch. By spending only one term, the North will have one advantage: it will be able to rule Nigeria for the next 12 years, instead of 8 years if Buhari re-contests in 2019. It is in this line that Atiku Abubakar spoke in favourof restructuring. But that remains a personal statement and not the collective will of the Fulani North.

The Fulani sees Nigeria as her inheritance. When people talk about Fulani supporting development and growth, they are mistaking. Development and growth means education and a deeper sense of the past. But to the average Fulani, that remain an outstanding threat to survival and the Fulani ability to manipulate Nigeria and shape the country in her own image. 

The Fulani came to Nigeria less than 250 years ago. The population is just 7million. The tribe imposed her will on most part of the North through the 1804 Jihad. Since then, it has survived through the mastery of intrigues and subterfuge. 

Fulani is ruled by fear of its extinction, having been famished in most African countries where the nationality once held sway, leaving Nigeria as the only country where the Fulani maintains her brutal stronghold on power. Her most potent weapon is “divide and rule.” It is in the interest of the Fulani to keep on postponing the doomsday in Nigeria. This is because the disintegration of Nigeria will expose the emptiness of the Fulani and possibly fuel Hausa uprising. The Hausa are perhaps the most traumatised ethnic group in the world. 

The Hausa land having been seized and taken over in an irreversible Fulani revolution, the Fulani Emirs today control the entire Hausa indigenous land and territories. It is to her convenience to be referred to as Hausa Fulani, but deep down, the Fulani is supremacist in nature, distrusts and hates the average Hausa person.

As the battle rages, between Tinubu and the Fulani North, there will be deceit and deception. Tinubu will be deceived into thinking the problem is Buhari. He will forge a new alliance with another Fulani group only for him to be disappointed again and again. The only alliance the Fulani understands is the one that sees the partner as a slave and the Fulani as the master. 

At the centre of all is the nationality question, the battle by ethnic lords to control Nigerian resources with Tinubu and Buhari being mere figures in the contest that did not start today. As 2019 draws nearer, the Fulani North is likely to realign with only one Fulani political figure, while the heat will be focused on Tinubu and his group. In this battle, every Yoruba person, unless those ready to play the second fiddle, will be seen as the enemy. 

The Fulani, with the state structure now firmly in her hands, will be more brutal and vicious in the campaign to decimate the South West, seek deceptive alliances with other regions, in other to isolate and humble her traditional foe, the Yoruba South West. 

It is in this context that agents of the Fulani are being recruited, across the South West to prosecute this primordial and well know war. 

Interestingly, if history serves as reference, this well known persecution and treachery of the Fulani, will only make Tinubu more popular among the Yoruba people. In the years, ahead, even Tinubu’s traditional enemies in Yorubaland will rally around him and rise up in his vigorous defence. 

Awo did not become a god until he was jailed by the Fulani oligarchy. 

MKO Abiola did not become a Yoruba icon until he was humiliated by the same Fulani North. 

The Yoruba people have a deep sense of history. Eliminating Tinubu will only make matter worse for a country that has not known peace since her forceful 1914 amalgamation. 

What will further save Tinubu is for him to go back to his people, the Yoruba, seek alliance with genuine forces working for the restructuring of Nigeria, and stop relying on building castles in the air, with the hope that a section of the Hausa-Fulani will one day align and work with him to rebuild Nigeria based on utilitarian values. 

At the end, the Fulani is not calculating enough and now at wits end. It would have been to the eternal glory of this race If the Fulani allow the culture of debate and democracy to nurture instead of being paranoid and ready to destroy everything in order to remain as the most precious political group.

THE IROHINOODUA EDITORIAL

SHOCKER: Jonathan's Letters Demanding For Illegal Monies Leak To Buhari

SHOCKER: Jonathan's Letters Demanding For Illegal Monies Leak To Buhari

President Muhammadu Buhari is in possession of some letters, written by former President Goodluck Jonathan, to request “off-budget funds.”

This was contained in Buhari’s authorised biography, ‘Muhammadu Buhari: The Challenges of Leadership in Nigeria’, written by Prof. John Paden and presented to the public on Monday.

An online dictionary defines “off-budget funds” as funds not provided for or included in the regular Federal Government budget; funded by sources other than the federal budget.


In the ongoing anti-corruption war of the present administration, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission had arrested and quizzed many of Jonathan’s former ministers and aides for alleged diversion of funds.

Most of them, including the former National Security Adviser, Col. Sambo Dasuki (retd.), are being prosecuted for allegedly diverting funds meant for arms procurement and using the funds for the prosecution of the 2015 presidential election in favour of Jonathan who was the candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party.

It is generally believed that the former government officials could not have spent the funds in question without Jonathan’s instructions.

The author captured the travails of the former office holders in Chapter 20 of the book, which is titled ‘Corruption and law in military procurement’.

Under the subheading, ‘The role of PDP leaders in the diversion of funds’, Paden said although the letters, written by the former President, were in Buhari’s possession, the President’s purpose of waging the corruption war was not to jail former top government officials but to retrieve the stolen funds.

He said the stability of the nation’s political system seemed to be at stake if the EFCC should go after Jonathan or any former President or military leader for that matter.

He, however, said such former Nigerian leaders could trade their knowledge for immunity and help the government identify patterns and sources of corruption.

Paden added, “The fact that Buhari was enlisting the help of international community in the probes lent weight to the seriousness of his effort – and also meant that alleged offenders had nowhere to hide.

“Would the trail lead to former President Jonathan himself? As of the early months of 2016, it appeared that the EFCC was not going after Jonathan. Nor was it going after former President Obasanjo.

“The question of the stability of the entire political system seemed at stake.

“In addition, a number of senior military officers, who had served as Heads of State – from Babangida to Abubakar – seemed off-limits.

“Indeed, rumours swirled that if the probes went after senior officers, they might push back because they had extensive networks in the active military services.

“At the same time, the knowledge such heavyweights possessed could well be traded for immunity and would help to illuminate the patterns and sources of corruption.

“Buhari had letters in his possession showing Jonathan’s requests for off-budget funds. But Buhari’s larger purpose was not to put former high-level officials in jail.

“Rather, it was to retrieve stolen funds and to change the political culture of the country.”

Meanwhile, the author also revealed that a total of 184 civil servants were disciplined for their different roles in the padding of the 2016 budget.

Of the 184, Paden said 22 top officials were dismissed from service.

He said the President viewed the padding as an attempt to scuttle his administration’s innovations, hence his decision to wield the big stick against the culprits.

The author wrote, “Buhari himself was frustrated by earlier padding of the budget by bureaucrats in some of the ministries.

“This was interpreted by the Buhari team as an attempt to scuttle the innovations proposed by the President by inflating their costs.

“When Buhari found out, he was reported to be angry and ordered a purge of the ministries involved from the Director-General down.

“Twenty-two top officials were dismissed, including the budget director. In all, 184 civil servants were disciplined.”

He added that even after the budget had been adjusted downward by the National Assembly, the country would still have to borrow $3.5bn, as a result of the drop in oil prices.

In February, Buhari had while addressing the Nigerian community in Saudi Arabia, vowed that all those involved in the padding of the 2016 national budget, which led to the discrepancies in the document, would face severe punishment.

He had said the alterations, which he described as embarrassing and disappointing, made the document, being debated in the National Assembly at that time, completely different from what was prepared by the Ministry of Budget and National Planning.

Describing those responsible for the distortion of the budget proposals as entrenched interests, the President had said since he had been holding public offices, he had never heard about budget padding before the incident.

Buhari had added, “The culprits will not go unpunished. I have been a military governor, petroleum minister, military Head of State and headed the Petroleum Trust Fund.

“Never had I heard the words budget padding. Our Minister of Budget and National Planning did a great job with his team.

“The minister became almost half his size during the time, working night and day to get the budget ready, only for some people to pad it.

“What he gave us was not what was finally being debated. It is very embarrassing and disappointing. We will not allow those who did it to go unpunished.”

Reaffirming his government’s zero tolerance for corruption, Buhari said the war against corruption was a monumental task that he was determined to tackle successfully.

Excerpted From Punch Newspaper
President Muhammadu Buhari is in possession of some letters, written by former President Goodluck Jonathan, to request “off-budget funds.”

This was contained in Buhari’s authorised biography, ‘Muhammadu Buhari: The Challenges of Leadership in Nigeria’, written by Prof. John Paden and presented to the public on Monday.

An online dictionary defines “off-budget funds” as funds not provided for or included in the regular Federal Government budget; funded by sources other than the federal budget.


In the ongoing anti-corruption war of the present administration, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission had arrested and quizzed many of Jonathan’s former ministers and aides for alleged diversion of funds.

Most of them, including the former National Security Adviser, Col. Sambo Dasuki (retd.), are being prosecuted for allegedly diverting funds meant for arms procurement and using the funds for the prosecution of the 2015 presidential election in favour of Jonathan who was the candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party.

It is generally believed that the former government officials could not have spent the funds in question without Jonathan’s instructions.

The author captured the travails of the former office holders in Chapter 20 of the book, which is titled ‘Corruption and law in military procurement’.

Under the subheading, ‘The role of PDP leaders in the diversion of funds’, Paden said although the letters, written by the former President, were in Buhari’s possession, the President’s purpose of waging the corruption war was not to jail former top government officials but to retrieve the stolen funds.

He said the stability of the nation’s political system seemed to be at stake if the EFCC should go after Jonathan or any former President or military leader for that matter.

He, however, said such former Nigerian leaders could trade their knowledge for immunity and help the government identify patterns and sources of corruption.

Paden added, “The fact that Buhari was enlisting the help of international community in the probes lent weight to the seriousness of his effort – and also meant that alleged offenders had nowhere to hide.

“Would the trail lead to former President Jonathan himself? As of the early months of 2016, it appeared that the EFCC was not going after Jonathan. Nor was it going after former President Obasanjo.

“The question of the stability of the entire political system seemed at stake.

“In addition, a number of senior military officers, who had served as Heads of State – from Babangida to Abubakar – seemed off-limits.

“Indeed, rumours swirled that if the probes went after senior officers, they might push back because they had extensive networks in the active military services.

“At the same time, the knowledge such heavyweights possessed could well be traded for immunity and would help to illuminate the patterns and sources of corruption.

“Buhari had letters in his possession showing Jonathan’s requests for off-budget funds. But Buhari’s larger purpose was not to put former high-level officials in jail.

“Rather, it was to retrieve stolen funds and to change the political culture of the country.”

Meanwhile, the author also revealed that a total of 184 civil servants were disciplined for their different roles in the padding of the 2016 budget.

Of the 184, Paden said 22 top officials were dismissed from service.

He said the President viewed the padding as an attempt to scuttle his administration’s innovations, hence his decision to wield the big stick against the culprits.

The author wrote, “Buhari himself was frustrated by earlier padding of the budget by bureaucrats in some of the ministries.

“This was interpreted by the Buhari team as an attempt to scuttle the innovations proposed by the President by inflating their costs.

“When Buhari found out, he was reported to be angry and ordered a purge of the ministries involved from the Director-General down.

“Twenty-two top officials were dismissed, including the budget director. In all, 184 civil servants were disciplined.”

He added that even after the budget had been adjusted downward by the National Assembly, the country would still have to borrow $3.5bn, as a result of the drop in oil prices.

In February, Buhari had while addressing the Nigerian community in Saudi Arabia, vowed that all those involved in the padding of the 2016 national budget, which led to the discrepancies in the document, would face severe punishment.

He had said the alterations, which he described as embarrassing and disappointing, made the document, being debated in the National Assembly at that time, completely different from what was prepared by the Ministry of Budget and National Planning.

Describing those responsible for the distortion of the budget proposals as entrenched interests, the President had said since he had been holding public offices, he had never heard about budget padding before the incident.

Buhari had added, “The culprits will not go unpunished. I have been a military governor, petroleum minister, military Head of State and headed the Petroleum Trust Fund.

“Never had I heard the words budget padding. Our Minister of Budget and National Planning did a great job with his team.

“The minister became almost half his size during the time, working night and day to get the budget ready, only for some people to pad it.

“What he gave us was not what was finally being debated. It is very embarrassing and disappointing. We will not allow those who did it to go unpunished.”

Reaffirming his government’s zero tolerance for corruption, Buhari said the war against corruption was a monumental task that he was determined to tackle successfully.

Excerpted From Punch Newspaper

New Robust Electoral Act Ready Soon As FG Inaugurates Constitution And Electoral Reform C'ttee, See Full List Of Members

New Robust Electoral Act Ready Soon As FG Inaugurates Constitution And Electoral Reform C'ttee, See Full List Of Members

ken nnamani
The Honourable Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, SAN has charged members of the Committee on Constitution and Electoral Reform to look into the possible  amendments to the Constitution and Electoral Act , as well as other legal instruments concerning elections to facilitate the attainment of a more robust and generally acceptable electoral system.

According to a press release from the Office of the Special Adviser, Media and Publicity to the Honourable Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice and issued by Comrade Salihu Othman Isah, the Minister gave this charge while inaugurating members of the Committee on Constitution and Electoral Reform in his office last Tuesday in Abuja.


Isah disclosed that the AGF emphasized that the committee would leverage on their combined wealth of experience to review the electoral environment, relevant laws and also experiences from the recent elections conducted in Nigeria and make recommendations to strengthen and achieve the conduct of free and fair elections in the country.

He affirmed that it is obligatory on the part of the committee “to take a holistic and critical look of the recommendations of Justice Uwais Electoral Reform Committee.”

“The committee must consult far and wide, across all spectra of the society and in particular with the National Assembly and the Judiciary in order to make recommendations that would stand the test of times”.

“It is our expectation that the committee would turn in a report which dept and quality should resound for years to come and would facilitate the re-engineering of our electoral practice” he added.

The AGF also stressed that the committee is expected to come up with a draft executive memo for Federal Executive Council vetting, pledging to back it up with draft Executive Bill that may ultimately place our electoral system on a good pedestal enough to accommodate progressive reforms in future elections and electoral space.

The committee has the following terms of reference:
i.      Review of the laws impacting elections in Nigeria, including relevant provisions of the 1999 Constitution(as amended) and the Electoral Act 2012 (as amended) to assess their impact and adequacy for the administration of elections in Nigeria.
ii.     Review and recommend the jurisdictional mandates of the proposed Electoral Tribunal.
iii.    Review of recent judicial decisions on election petitions as they relate to:
a.      Conflicting judgments.
b.      Absence of consequential orders.
c.      Delays in the issuance of Certified True Copies of Judgments.
d.      Harmonise the Electoral Act in view of these judgments with a view to enhancing the electoral process.
iv.     Review of the lessons learnt from the 2015 general elections and make recommendations for the improvement of the electoral system.
v.      Identify and assess international best practices on elections and electoral systems relevant to Nigeria’s experience and identify best practices that would impact positively on the quality and credibility of the nation’s electoral process.
vi.     Review the extent of implementation of the recommendations of the 2008 Electoral Reform Committee (ERC) headed by Justice Mohammad Uwais  and advise on outstanding issues for implementation.
vii.    Identify areas of the constitution impacting on the conduct of the elections that needed reform.
viii.   Recommend the best approach to effective prosecution of electoral offences.
ix.     Consolidate the recommendations for Electoral Reforms into a single Electoral Act Bill to achieve the repeal of the 2010 Electoral Act and re-enactment of a new Electoral Act for the country.
x.      Prepare and recommend a draft bill for approval of the President for submission to the National Assembly for enactment.
xi.     Coordinate with the National Assembly to achieve timely passage into law of the proposed bill.
xii.    Make any recommendations deemed necessary for the realization of these terms of reference and
xiii.   Submit a report of its recommendations for reforms and draft clauses and provisions to be proposed for legislative action within (10) weeks.

Full list of members of the committee, carefully selected based on their experience, maturity and resourcefulness and drawn from all walks of life include, Senator Ken Nnamani, Chairman, Dr. Muiz Banire, SAN, Mr. Oluwole Osaze Uzzi, Mrs Babalola O. O., Mr. Duruaku Chima, Mrs. Musa I. Maryam, Mr. H.A Tahir, Mr. Ike Udunni, Ibrahim S. O., Esther Uzoma, Mr. Eze Philip and Bashir Yusuf Ibrahim.

Others are Abiola Akiyode-Afolabi , Mr. Utum Eteng, Mr. Ejike Eze, Chief A.C. Ude, Mrs. E. Ifendu, Dr. Francis Abang Bullen, Mr. Anike Nwoga, Mrs. Cecilia Adams, Mr. Clement Nwankwo, Mr. C. Jude, Mr. Mohammed Bello Tukur, Mrs. Juliet Ibekaku while Dr. Mamman Lawalill serve as Secretary,.

In his acceptance speech, former Senate President who is chairman of the Committee, Senator Ken Nnamani disclosed that his willingness to serve in the committee was driven by his conviction that Mr. President has the political will to implement its report.

Nnamani promised to work tirelessly with other members to produce a document that would amongst other things reduce the tendency of getting electoral victory through the courts other than the ballot boxes.

He therefore on behalf of other members expressed gratitude to President Buhari for counting them worthy to play a role in this regards.
ken nnamani
The Honourable Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, SAN has charged members of the Committee on Constitution and Electoral Reform to look into the possible  amendments to the Constitution and Electoral Act , as well as other legal instruments concerning elections to facilitate the attainment of a more robust and generally acceptable electoral system.

According to a press release from the Office of the Special Adviser, Media and Publicity to the Honourable Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice and issued by Comrade Salihu Othman Isah, the Minister gave this charge while inaugurating members of the Committee on Constitution and Electoral Reform in his office last Tuesday in Abuja.


Isah disclosed that the AGF emphasized that the committee would leverage on their combined wealth of experience to review the electoral environment, relevant laws and also experiences from the recent elections conducted in Nigeria and make recommendations to strengthen and achieve the conduct of free and fair elections in the country.

He affirmed that it is obligatory on the part of the committee “to take a holistic and critical look of the recommendations of Justice Uwais Electoral Reform Committee.”

“The committee must consult far and wide, across all spectra of the society and in particular with the National Assembly and the Judiciary in order to make recommendations that would stand the test of times”.

“It is our expectation that the committee would turn in a report which dept and quality should resound for years to come and would facilitate the re-engineering of our electoral practice” he added.

The AGF also stressed that the committee is expected to come up with a draft executive memo for Federal Executive Council vetting, pledging to back it up with draft Executive Bill that may ultimately place our electoral system on a good pedestal enough to accommodate progressive reforms in future elections and electoral space.

The committee has the following terms of reference:
i.      Review of the laws impacting elections in Nigeria, including relevant provisions of the 1999 Constitution(as amended) and the Electoral Act 2012 (as amended) to assess their impact and adequacy for the administration of elections in Nigeria.
ii.     Review and recommend the jurisdictional mandates of the proposed Electoral Tribunal.
iii.    Review of recent judicial decisions on election petitions as they relate to:
a.      Conflicting judgments.
b.      Absence of consequential orders.
c.      Delays in the issuance of Certified True Copies of Judgments.
d.      Harmonise the Electoral Act in view of these judgments with a view to enhancing the electoral process.
iv.     Review of the lessons learnt from the 2015 general elections and make recommendations for the improvement of the electoral system.
v.      Identify and assess international best practices on elections and electoral systems relevant to Nigeria’s experience and identify best practices that would impact positively on the quality and credibility of the nation’s electoral process.
vi.     Review the extent of implementation of the recommendations of the 2008 Electoral Reform Committee (ERC) headed by Justice Mohammad Uwais  and advise on outstanding issues for implementation.
vii.    Identify areas of the constitution impacting on the conduct of the elections that needed reform.
viii.   Recommend the best approach to effective prosecution of electoral offences.
ix.     Consolidate the recommendations for Electoral Reforms into a single Electoral Act Bill to achieve the repeal of the 2010 Electoral Act and re-enactment of a new Electoral Act for the country.
x.      Prepare and recommend a draft bill for approval of the President for submission to the National Assembly for enactment.
xi.     Coordinate with the National Assembly to achieve timely passage into law of the proposed bill.
xii.    Make any recommendations deemed necessary for the realization of these terms of reference and
xiii.   Submit a report of its recommendations for reforms and draft clauses and provisions to be proposed for legislative action within (10) weeks.

Full list of members of the committee, carefully selected based on their experience, maturity and resourcefulness and drawn from all walks of life include, Senator Ken Nnamani, Chairman, Dr. Muiz Banire, SAN, Mr. Oluwole Osaze Uzzi, Mrs Babalola O. O., Mr. Duruaku Chima, Mrs. Musa I. Maryam, Mr. H.A Tahir, Mr. Ike Udunni, Ibrahim S. O., Esther Uzoma, Mr. Eze Philip and Bashir Yusuf Ibrahim.

Others are Abiola Akiyode-Afolabi , Mr. Utum Eteng, Mr. Ejike Eze, Chief A.C. Ude, Mrs. E. Ifendu, Dr. Francis Abang Bullen, Mr. Anike Nwoga, Mrs. Cecilia Adams, Mr. Clement Nwankwo, Mr. C. Jude, Mr. Mohammed Bello Tukur, Mrs. Juliet Ibekaku while Dr. Mamman Lawalill serve as Secretary,.

In his acceptance speech, former Senate President who is chairman of the Committee, Senator Ken Nnamani disclosed that his willingness to serve in the committee was driven by his conviction that Mr. President has the political will to implement its report.

Nnamani promised to work tirelessly with other members to produce a document that would amongst other things reduce the tendency of getting electoral victory through the courts other than the ballot boxes.

He therefore on behalf of other members expressed gratitude to President Buhari for counting them worthy to play a role in this regards.

Trending

randomposts

Like Us

fb/https://www.facebook.com/newsproof
google.com, pub-6536761625640326, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0